Sunday, November 15, 2009

Dan Savage pokes big holes in the Religious Rights' "Re-defining marriage" argument



Hat tip: BTB Share

1 comment:

Michael said...

Dan is right in many ways, but what if gay people are changing marriage? Or, if we're not doing it intentionally, what if allowing same-sex couples to marry redefines marriage? Dan's argument still holds - marriage has, over the centuries, been constantly redefined. So, actually, (us) homos getting married might change marriage, but so what? Seems like a weak argument to deny access to the institution to me. The question regarding whether we homos should want same sex marriage - should we want to assimilate into hetero culture and institutions a better one...